Bias: No Right to Respond for Religious Minority

Heavy bias in Japanese media – religious minority given no right to respond to false allegations

Tokyo, 11th September 2024 – Published as the 28th article in a series in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article

Series: Freedom of Religion Under Threat – Part 4: Media Crossing the Line

“Live Commentary” Infringing on Freedom of Expression

Miyane-ya deviates from normal journalistic practices

by the Religious Freedom Investigative Team of the editorial department of Sekai Nippo

See part 1: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article

See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article

See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article

See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article

See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article

See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 40th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article

See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48th article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article, 55th article

See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article

A: “We are deeply saddened by the reports that the suspect, who is considered the perpetrator, acted out of resentment towards our organization, the Family Federation. We sincerely apologize for the various disturbances caused to society.”

B: “They’re apologizing for the wrong thing. They’re acting like it’s someone else’s problem.”

This exchange took place on 10^th August 2022, during the opening part of a press conference by Tomihiro Tanaka (田中富広), the president of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church), which was broadcast live on Yomiuri TV’s program “Miyane-ya”, hosted by comedian Seiji Miyane (宮根誠司).

A refers to Tomihiro Tanaka, and B refers to journalist Eito Suzuki (鈴木エイト), who is well-versed in information about the Family Federation. However, the two did not actually have this exchange at the press conference venue. The program overlaid Suzuki’s screen frame on the screen where Tanaka was reading the statement, and while his remarks were being translated verbatim into English, the program had Suzuki provide real-time commentary. “Miyane-ya” labeled this as “Live Commentary by Attorney Masaki Kito (紀藤正樹) and Eito Suzuki.”

At the time, there was heightened interest in the press conference by the head of the religious organization due to the motive of the man who shot former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (安倍晋三), which was said to be resentment towards the former Unification Church. However, there were also concerns within the television industry about broadcasting the religious organization’s claims live as they were. Simply put, there was a concern that “it might send incorrect information to viewers” (as reported by Tokyo Sports Web on 11^th August 2022).

According to fundamental principles of reporting the claims of the religious organization should be accurately conveyed and, if there were any counterarguments, those ought to be presented equally as well. However, the method taken by Miyane-ya, as described above, was carried over to subsequent live broadcasts of the press conferences held by the organization (Family Federation for World Peace and Unification) and even escalated.

In a press conference broadcast on 22^nd September 2022 featuring Hideyuki Teshigawara (勅使河原秀行), head of the Family Federation Church Reform Promotion Headquarters, and his legal adviser Nobuya Fukumoto (福本修也), two “live commentators” – on that day, journalists critical of the religious organization: Yoshifu Arita (有田芳生（よしふ）and Eito Suzuki. They were superimposed on the bottom left and right of the screen, and each commentator held up a horizontal sign that read “Objection!” Then a red sign with the word “Objection!” appeared on the screen, after which each commentator’s argument was presented in short sentences.

This method used by Miyane-ya deviated from normal reporting standards. The TV screen became a completely unfair space. The religious organization was not given the opportunity to respond, and across a variety of rapidly shifting topics, only the views of the critics were aired at the end. This created the impression that the religious organization was making nonsensical claims, and it seemed as though it had no right to explain or express its opinions. The program not only lacked fairness, but also severely infringed on the freedom of expression of the Family Federation.

For example, during Tomihiro Tanaka’s press conference, he stated,

“Due to strict adherence to the compliance mentioned above, what is referred to as ‘spiritual sales’ is not being conducted by our organization‘s followers, and there have been no reports of damage.”

However, Eito Suzuki responded by saying,

“They conduct spiritual sales without involving products. They give something in exchange for donations, […] they have just changed their methods.”

This is a typical use of a fallacious argument, bringing up the different concept of “spiritual sales without involving products” to shift the argument away from what Tanaka had actually stated.

At this point, Suzuki remarked, “It’s not about selling those vases for hundreds of thousands of yen.” Commentator Patrick Harlan (known as “Pakkun”) pressed him, saying, “So, it’s true that they don’t conduct spiritual sales anymore.” Suzuki was forced to admit, “Yes, basically, they don’t involve products.”

In all the press conference broadcasts, Seiji Miyane (宮根誠司) ended the program by allowing only the specialists critical of the religious organization to express their one-sided opinions. This can only be described as crossing the line into biased reporting.

End of part 4 (23rd to 28th article) 

See part 1: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article

See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article

See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article

See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article

See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article

See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 40th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article

See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48th article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article, 55th article

See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article

Featured image above: From the TV program ‘Information Live Miyaneya’ aired on 22^nd September 2022. Photo: Sekai Nippo

Related to bias: no right to respond: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

More, related to bias: no right to respond: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to bias: no right to respond: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to bias: no right to respond: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more, related to bias: no right to respond: Japan Following the Way of China

And still more, related to bias: no right to respond: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan

And even more, related to bias: no right to respond: Conference on Religious Freedom Violations

Still more, related to bias: no right to respond: Japan: Threat to Religious Freedom

Even more, related to bias: no right to respond: Call to End Witch Hunt

More, related to bias: no right to respond: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out

More, related to bias: no right to respond: Japan: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions

And more, related to bias: no right to respond: Illegalities of Activist Lawyers Exposed

Yet more, related to bias: no right to respond: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying

Still more, related to bias: no right to respond: Biased Information from Leftwing Lawyers

Even more, related to bias: no right to respond: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions

Even more, related to bias: no right to respond: Kyodo News: 100s of Rights Violations Claimed

Even more, related to bias: no right to respond: Fabricated Torts Part of Wily Strategy in Japan