Big Paper: State Accused of Altering Evidence

Sankei Shimbun reveals controversy over Family Federation trial as government ministry faces accusations of altering evidence

See also 6 Ministry Officials Sued Over Evidence Forgery

See also Forged Evidence: Japan’s Biggest Postwar Scandal?

See also Big Daily: Authorities Using Outdated Evidence

The Sankei Shimbun, one of Japan’s five largest national newspapers by circulation, revealed in an article on 25^th February 2025, details of a controversy that involves the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, formerly known as the Unification Church. A dispute has arisen over a closed-door hearing at the Tokyo District Court regarding the petition from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) to dissolve the religious organization that is relatively large in Japan, with its 600,000 members.

The Family Federation has challenged the credibility of some evidence submitted by MEXT, arguing that statements collected from current and former members include fabrications. In response, Minister Toshiko Abe (阿部俊子) maintained that disclosing evidence from a confidential court session is not appropriate.

According to the Sankei Shimbun, the religious organization released on 19^th February a report authored by its legal team, titled “Fabrication of False Evidence by MEXT”. The report claims that a significant portion of the 261 written statements presented by MEXT in court were compiled by government officials following interviews with members and ex-members.

The Sankei article claims that two former members of the religious minority during the hearing process testified that portions of their written statements contained information unfamiliar to them. They admitted to signing and stamping the documents without thoroughly reviewing their content.

Meanwhile, a current member alleged that MEXT officials recorded their testimony without explaining its purpose and later compiled it into a statement. This document concluded with the phrase “I can only hope for the dissolution (of the religious organization),” but the individual insisted they had never made such a remark and did not view themselves as a victim. Consequently, they requested a correction.

Additionally, the large daily reports that other statements included errors unlikely to have been made by actual members. One example involved a linguistic inconsistency: within the Family Federation, the biblical figure Eve is traditionally referred to as “Eba” in Japanese, yet the statements used “Ibu”, which closely mirrors the English pronunciation of “Eve”.

Another discrepancy was the use of the term “priest” (Japanese: 神父 – shinpu) – a designation common in Catholicism but not used within the Family Federation to refer to religious leaders. The organization argues that these inaccuracies indicate the statements were crafted by officials from MEXT, and not by members of the Family Federation or former adherents.

The Sankei Shimbun mentions in addition that the religious organization asserts that some individuals whose statements were included had no known record of membership of the Family Federation. Among them were people who had previously made donations, but not necessarily to the religious organization – some had contributed to other religious groups.

Responding to these allegations, Minister Abe stated – according to the Sankei – at a press conference on 21^st February that the government’s request for a court order to dissolve the Family Federation “was made appropriately”.

The government minister criticized however the decision by the religious organization to release the report, contending that making evidence from the trial public contradicts the very rationale for conducting the hearings privately. She also stated that the government had communicated its concerns about this disclosure to the court. However, she refrained from expressing whether the statements the Family Federation has called into question were correct or not.

This ongoing dispute adds further complexity to the case, as the credibility of key testimonies is now under scrutiny. The controversy surrounding the evidence could potentially impact the court’s decision on whether to approve the dissolution order sought by MEXT.

Text: Knut Holdhus

See also 6 Ministry Officials Sued Over Evidence Forgery

See also Forged Evidence: Japan’s Biggest Postwar Scandal?

See also Big Daily: Authorities Using Outdated Evidence

Featured image above: Toshiko Abe (阿部俊子), Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). Photo (2023):  首相官邸ホームページ / Wikimedia Commons. License: CC Attr 4.0 Int. Cropped

Related to altering evidence in dissolution case: “Poorly Compiled Evidence Including Falsehoods”

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Huge Scandal: “Ministry Is Falsifying Affidavits”

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Japan’s New Laws to Curb New Religious Movements

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: New Law Designed to Bankrupt Family Federation

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Terms from Consumer Law Used to Rob Faith

And also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: New Law Manufacturing “Victims”, Dividing Families

And also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Maverick Minister Lets “3 Foxes in the Henhouse”

More, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Journalist Reveals Ugly Leftwing Conspiracy

And more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy

And more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Courts Using Debunked Concepts Against Minority

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Dissolution Case: Wild Claims, Illegal Actions

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: 2nd-Generation Members Protesting Persecution

Also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And also related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Bias: No Right to Respond for Religious Minority

More, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Two European Scholars Warning Japan

And yet more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Japan Censured at Religious Freedom Event

And still more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Lawyer Exposes Dirty Leftwing Plot

And even more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And still more, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Malicious One-Sided Government Source Selection

More, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out

More, related to altering evidence in dissolution case: Kishida Has Opened Can of Worms