Brussels Press Conference Condemns Dissolution

Human Rights Advocates Condemn Japan’s Dissolution of Family Federation at Brussels Press Conference

Tokyo, 30^th June 2026 – Published as an article in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article.

Human Rights Advocates Criticize Family Federation Dissolution in European Press Conference

by the foreign news department of Sekai Nippo

A press conference protesting what participants described as the unjust dissolution order against the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church) was held on 29^th June at the Press Club in Brussels, Belgium. Along with nonfiction writer Masumi Fukuda (福田ますみ), representatives of international human rights organizations criticized the dissolution of the Family Federation and expressed serious concerns about the state of religious freedom in Japan.

See also The Hidden Story Japan Doesn’t Want You to Hear

See also Japanese Court Assumes the Role of Inquisitor

See also: Japan: The Political Origins of Smear Campaign

See also: This Is About More Than One Religion

Fukuda, author of The Sacrifice of the State (国家の生贄), a book addressing the issues surrounding the dissolution order against the Family Federation, criticized the ruling, saying,

“This dissolution decision is unjust and cannot be regarded as the result of a rigorous trial based on evidence.”

She further argued,

“Although the existence of illegal conduct was never proven, the decision was nevertheless handed down because of biased media coverage portraying the Family Federation as a ‘cult’.”

When asked why Japanese politicians have been reluctant to speak out on the issue, Fukuda replied that “simply defending the Family Federation has become taboo.”

As the reason for this, she pointed to the National Network of Lawyers Against Spiritual Sales (Zenkokubenren), a left-leaning lawyers’ organization politically opposed to the Family Federation. She stated that “for many years the lawyers’ network has spread the social stigma that the Family Federation is a problematic organization,” adding that society as a whole has been strongly influenced by this perception.

See more from Masumi Fukuda’s speech: The Hidden Story Japan Doesn’t Want You to Hear

Willy Fautré, director of the international human rights organization Human Rights Without Frontiers, said,

“For a nonviolent religious organization to be dissolved by court order constitutes one of the most serious interferences with freedom of religion in a democratic country.”

He continued,

“Such measures have traditionally been viewed as problems associated with authoritarian states. However, Japan’s decision could have repercussions for other countries as well.”

French international human rights lawyer Patricia Duval stated that the dissolution order against the Family Federation “is not merely the dissolution of a legal entity; it is an issue concerning the eradication of a faith.”

She further claimed that there are efforts within the educational system to separate children from their parents‘ religion, adding,

“This could be described as a form of deprogramming under another name – a serious interference with religious freedom.”

Norishige Kondo (近藤徳茂), who formerly served as deputy director of the church’s Legal Affairs Office, criticized the Supreme Court’s 22^nd June decision to reject the religious organization‘s final appeal, thereby making the dissolution order final, saying that “there are serious problems with the court’s factual findings.”

He emphasized that the number of unlawful acts had declined substantially after 2009, and that by the time the government filed its petition for dissolution, such incidents had become extremely rare. Nevertheless, he argued that “the Tokyo District Court found unlawful conduct based on speculation without sufficient concrete evidence.”

He added, “Despite this being contrary to the principle that judicial decisions should be based on evidence, both the High Court and the Supreme Court upheld those findings.”

In addition, Kimihiro Okamitsu (岡光君啓), a second-generation member of the Family Federation and former head of a facility of the religious organization in Tokyo’s Shinjuku (新宿) district, delivered a video message describing the events on the day of the Tokyo High Court‘s ruling in March.

“Just 15 minutes after the judgment was handed down, the court-appointed liquidator demanded that we vacate the premises immediately,” he said.

“That was not simply a matter of real estate – it was the moment when the foundation of our faith was trampled upon.”

He questioned whether “a measure that deprives believers of their places of worship and their religious community can truly be regarded as a guarantee of freedom of religion.”

See also The Hidden Story Japan Doesn’t Want You to Hear

See also Japanese Court Assumes the Role of Inquisitor

See also: Japan: The Political Origins of Smear Campaign

See also: This Is About More Than One Religion

Featured image above: Participants at the press conference criticizing the dissolution order against the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church) at the Brussels Press Club on 29^th June 2026. From right: nonfiction writer Masumi Fukuda; Willy Fautré, director of the international human rights organization Human Rights Without Frontiers; Norishige Kondo, former deputy director of the religious organization‘s Legal Affairs Office; and international human rights lawyer Patricia Duval. Photo: Sekai Nippo

Related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Lawfare: State Uses Legal System in War on Faith

More, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Scholar Questions Secrecy in Dissolution Case

And more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Shocked Author: “Japan Ignores Basics of Justice”

Still more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Legal Inconsistencies A Blow to Democracy

Even more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Japan: Court Accused of Using Speculation

Also related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: MEXT’s Legal Spin and “Dissolution at All Costs”

Also related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: UN Report: Japan’s Lawfare Against Faith Minority

And also related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Protesting No Transparency in Closed-Door Trial

More, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Dangerous Flaws in Dissolution Order Decried

Also related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: “Lawyers Lying and Shaming Japan” for 50 Years

And also related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Japan Following the Way of China

And also related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Japan’s Dissolution Case Echoes China’s Playbook

More, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Media/Legal Expert: Communism Behind Persecution

And more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy

More, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: Japan Copying China: State Seizure of Churches

And still more, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan

More, related to Brussels press conference condemning dissolution: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions

And more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Japan: Families Fear for Graves of Loved Ones

Yet more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying

Also related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Kishida Follows Anti-Family Federation Minister

Also related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy

Still more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Malicious One-Sided Government Source Selection

And still more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Japan Urged to Make U-Turn

And yet more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions

Even more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Japan Following the Way of China

Yet more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Japanese Communists’ Final War

Still more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Political and Social Activism behind Oppression

Still more, related to Brussels conference condemning dissolution: Dissolution Case: Rule of Law on Trial 4th March