Dissolution Case: Courts Must Not Reward Terror

Yamagami’s life sentence closes the criminal case, but dissolution efforts backed by courts risk validating the very objectives of his terrorism

Tokyo, 30^th January 2026 – Published as an article in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article. 

Judicial Integrity That Must Not “Reward” Terrorism

The “Yamagami Terror Attack” and the Dissolution of a Religious Organization

by Seisaku Morita (森田 清策)

See also Upbringing No Excuse as Abe Assassin Gets Life

See also Justice Rendered, Questions Remain in Abe Murder

See also Murder of Abe Was Terrorism ‒ Trial Must Say So

See also Religious Freedom Threat: China-Led Alliance

See also Figures from Hostile Lawyers Hugely Inflated

The Nara District Court has sentenced defendant Tetsuya Yamagami (山上徹也) to life imprisonment. By imposing the harshest penalty short of the death sentence, the court effectively recognized that the shooting of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (安倍晋三) was a premeditated act of terrorism. Although an appeal remains possible, the first-instance judgment brings a provisional conclusion to the criminal acts committed by the defendant.

While the sentencing itself can be regarded as appropriate, it is regrettable that the ruling did not delve into the political and social impact brought about by the terrorist act. That remains the unresolved issue. Only by drawing lessons from a terrorist attack that claimed the life of the politician who served the longest tenure as prime minister in Japan’s constitutional history can recurrence be prevented – and such reflection would serve as the bare minimum form of requiem for Shinzo Abe.

When considering the societal problems caused by the “Yamagami terror attack”, the key point lies in the defendant’s objective in attempting to take Abe’s life. According to the judgment, Yamagami harbored resentment toward the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church), believing that his life had been ruined by his mother’s faith and her large financial donations to the organization.

Seeking to “strike back” at the group, he shot Abe, who had sent a video message to an event hosted by an organization affiliated with the Federation. The defendant believed that doing so would focus public criticism on the religious organization.

One particularly conspicuous development triggered by the terror attack was the move to seek a dissolution order against the Family Federation. In March of last year, the Tokyo District Court issued a decision ordering the dissolution of the organization under the Religious Corporations Act. The organization immediately filed an interlocutory appeal [Editor’s note: an appeal filed before a case has reached a final judgment, challenging a specific interim ruling made by a lower court]. The Tokyo High Court is expected to issue its decision within the current fiscal year [Editor’s note: which ends on 31^st March].

In the context of terrorism, the question of what a court-issued dissolution order signifies is crucial: it would amount to the judiciary condoning a disregard for due process – the core of the rule of law. Since due process is a constitutional principle, its violation is a matter of grave concern.

The trigger for the dissolution request process was pulled by then-Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (岸田文雄), who was in office at the time of the attack. Immediately after the incident, the media launched intense criticism of the religious organization, and the Liberal Democratic Party – some of whose members had “ties” to groups friendly to the organization – was swept into the storm.

However, in October 2022, the Kishida administration issued a cabinet decision stating that a dissolution order could not be applied to an organization whose executives had not been criminally convicted, and it answered in the Diet that civil-law torts were “not included” among the requirements. Yet the very next day, Kishida reversed his previous statement, declaring that they “were included”.

Until that point, the Agency for Cultural Affairs had maintained that civil-law torts were not part of the requirements, in consideration of the gravity of the “freedom of religion” guaranteed by the Constitution. This position was overturned overnight.

Aside from objections raised by a small number of legal professionals, Kishida’s disregard for the principle of due process attracted little attention from opposition parties, the media, or public opinion. Everything unfolded in a manner consistent with the aims of defendant Yamagami.

The neglect of due process was subsequently endorsed by the judiciary as well. If, following the Tokyo District Court, the Tokyo High Court were also to issue a dissolution order, it would produce a result aligned with the defendant’s intent to “strike back” at the organization – effectively granting a “reward” to a terrorist.

In March 2019, following the mosque shootings in New Zealand, then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern stated in a parliamentary address, “We will give terrorists nothing.” What one hopes for from the Tokyo High Court is not a decision that rewards terrorism, but rather the sound judgment to send a clear message that society must never be allowed to be moved by violence.

See also Court Rejects Media Narrative in Yamagami Case

See also Upbringing No Excuse as Abe Assassin Gets Life

See also Murder of Abe Was Terrorism ‒ Trial Must Say So

See also Religious Freedom Threat: China-Led Alliance

See also Figures from Hostile Lawyers Hugely Inflated

Featured image above: Courts must not reward terror. Illustration: ChatGPT 1st February 2026.

Related to courts rewarding terror Abe Murder 3-Year Trial Delay: Calls for Truth

Also related to courts rewarding terror: Lone-Wolf Theory Disputed in Abe Assassination

Also related to courts rewarding terror: “Organized Terrorism, Not Lone Wolf, Killed Abe”

Also related to courts rewarding terror:  Media Helping Terrorist Reach His Goal

Also related to courts rewarding terror: Kishida Administration Giving in to Terrorism

And also related to courts rewarding terror: Kishida Has Opened Can of Worms

More, related to courts rewarding terror: Aiding Terrorist, Media Bashes Minority Religion

And more, related to courts rewarding terror: Bizarre Atlantic Report Condoning Terror

Still more, related to courts rewarding terror: Japan Times: Warning of Terror

Yet more, related to courts rewarding terror: Did constant hate-mongering cause terror?

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

More, related to courts rewarding terror: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to courts rewarding terror: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to courts rewarding terror: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Japan Following the Way of China

And still more, related to courts rewarding terror: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan

And even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Conference on Religious Freedom Violations

Still more, related to courts rewarding terror: Japan: Threat to Religious Freedom

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Call to End Witch Hunt

More, related to courts rewarding terror: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out

More, related to courts rewarding terror: Japan: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions

And more, related to courts rewarding terror: Illegalities of Activist Lawyers Exposed

Yet more, related to courts rewarding terror: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying

Still more, related to courts rewarding terror: Biased Information from Leftwing Lawyers

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Kyodo News: 100s of Rights Violations Claimed

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Fabricated Torts Part of Wily Strategy in Japan

And even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Yamagami Trial: Peril of Romanticizing Terror

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Social Media, Reporting Cited as Fueling Terror

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Selective Justice: Special Law Against One Faith

Even more, related to courts rewarding terror: Lawfare: State Uses Legal System in War on Faith