Japan’s Next Step: Indoctrination of Children

Japanese school children next step

European human rights expert points out how the Japanese authorities with “cult experts” as advisors have stepped up their assault on large religious minority Family Federation by implementing plan that includes indoctrinating school children

Bitter Winter
Logo of Bitter Winter, the world’s leading online magazine on religious liberty and human rights.
Patricia Duval
Patricia Duval – Member of the Paris Bar Association, specializing in international human rights law. Has defended the rights of religious and faith minorities both in France and internationally. Photo (2025): Sekai Nippo

In the third installment of her four-part series examining the treatment of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification – formerly the Unification Church – in Japan following the government’s dissolution proceedings against the movement, Paris-based international human rights attorney Patricia Duval turns her attention to a subject she considers particularly significant: the policies directed toward children of Family Federation families.

Continued in part 2: Japan’s Treatment of Faith Minority Families

See also When Raising Children in Faith Turns Suspicious

See also Japan: Only Freedom to Believe, Not to Practice

See also Supreme Court Upholds Dissolution of Federation

See also Ruling Leaves Serious Questions on Due Process

See also Did Korean Origins Shape Dissolution Outcome?

Published in the human rights and religious liberty magazine Bitter Winter on 3rd June 2026, the article argues that the Japanese government’s response to controversies surrounding the Family Federation has evolved beyond legal actions against the religious organization itself and now encompasses educational, counseling, and child-protection initiatives aimed at minors whose parents belong to the movement.

Duval contends that these measures amount to a state-sponsored effort to indoctrinate children raised in Family Federation households and reshape their attitudes and beliefs. According to her analysis, the policies are presented by authorities as child-protection mechanisms but function, in practice, as programs designed to persuade children that their parents’ religious commitments have harmed them and that they should distance themselves from those beliefs.

The article focuses on two closely connected developments: the governmental action plan adopted in early 2024 and the official guidelines concerning what authorities describe as child abuse linked to religious beliefs. Together, Duval argues, these initiatives establish a framework through which schools, counselors, social workers, and child-protection agencies become active participants in monitoring, identifying, and intervening in the lives of children from certain religious communities.

Educational Programs and Awareness Campaigns

According to Duval, the governmental plan includes a variety of educational and counseling measures directed at young people. These initiatives are incorporated into schools and human rights education programs and are intended to increase awareness of issues associated with religion, particularly in relation to the Family Federation. Duval writes,

“The governmental measures adopted in January 2024 implement […] ‘awarenes-sraising‘ sessions organized as part of human rights courses, including ‘consumer education‘ on religious donations – as if donations to a church were a matter of consumer law – particularly regarding the “criminal financial activities” of the Unification Church, to make children ‘aware‘ of the problems that may arise from their parents’ membership in that church“.

Offering donation causing claims
Disputed donations. Here, woman offering donation that her son later wanted refunded. Illustration: Microsoft Designer Image Creator, 21st January 2025.

She describes a system in which children are exposed to educational materials discussing alleged religious abuses, including cartoons, online forums, and classroom activities. Additional lessons are integrated into broader human rights and consumer education curricula. These sessions reportedly address religious donations and financial contributions made by members of the religious organization, presenting them as matters that may affect families and children.

Duval emphasizes that the government frames these programs as awareness-raising efforts. However, she argues that their underlying message encourages children to view their parents’ religious commitments as inherently problematic. In her interpretation, the educational content is structured to lead children toward the conclusion that membership in the Family Federation is associated with harmful behavior and that they may themselves be victims of that environment.

The article further notes that schools distribute materials encouraging students to seek assistance if they have concerns related to religion in their homes. These include contact information for counseling services and written forms through which children can communicate worries or request support.

Counseling and Psychological Intervention

A major concern raised by Duval involves the counseling infrastructure accompanying these initiatives. She notes that counselors involved in the program may receive training from former members of the Family Federation who are critical of the movement.

In her view, this creates a significant risk that counseling services will not remain neutral. Rather than offering balanced support, she argues, such programs may encourage children to reinterpret their upbringing through a framework that assumes religious involvement is the source of emotional or psychological harm.

The article also discusses the possibility of referrals to mental health services. Children who express anxiety or distress connected to their parents’ religious affiliation may be directed toward psychological evaluation or counseling. Duval questions whether such interventions are based on objective assessments of harm or whether they reflect a broader assumption that membership in a controversial religious group is itself a source of concern.

She suggests that the cumulative effect of these measures is to encourage children to reconsider their parents’ beliefs and authority through a lens shaped by state-sponsored educational and counseling programs.

Continued in Japan’s Treatment of Faith Minority Families

See also When Raising Children in Faith Turns Suspicious

See also Japan: Only Freedom to Believe, Not to Practice

See also Supreme Court Upholds Dissolution of Federation

See also Ruling Leaves Serious Questions on Due Process

See also Did Korean Origins Shape Dissolution Outcome?

See also: Japan: The Political Origins of Smear Campaign

See also Corporation Dissolved – Organization Remains

Text: Knut Holdhus, editor

Featured image above: Japanese junior high school students in Kyomizu showing “peace” sign. The persons in the picture have no known relation to the Family Federation. Photo (2009): RageZ / Wikimedia Commons. License: CC Attr 2.0 Gen 

Related to Japan’s next step: Lawfare: State Uses Legal System in War on Faith

More, related to Japan’s next step: Scholar Questions Secrecy in Dissolution Case

And more, related to Japan’s next step: Shocked Author: “Japan Ignores Basics of Justice”

Still more, related to Japan’s next step: Legal Inconsistencies A Blow to Democracy

Even more, related to Japan’s next step: Japan: Court Accused of Using Speculation

Also related to Japan’s next step: MEXT’s Legal Spin and “Dissolution at All Costs”

Also related to Japan’s next step: UN Report: Japan’s Lawfare Against Faith Minority

And also related to Japan’s next step: Protesting No Transparency in Closed-Door Trial

More, related to Japan’s next step: Dangerous Flaws in Dissolution Order Decried

Also related to Japan’s next step: “Lawyers Lying and Shaming Japan” for 50 Years

And also related to Japan’s next step: Japan Following the Way of China

And also related to Japan’s next step: Japan’s Dissolution Case Echoes China’s Playbook

More, related to Japan’s next step: Media/Legal Expert: Communism Behind Persecution

And more, related to Japan’s next step: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy

More, related to Japan’s next step: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to Japan’s next step: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to Japan’s next step: Japan Copying China: State Seizure of Churches

And still more, related to Japan’s next step: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan

More, related to Japan’s next step: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions

And more, related to Japan’s next step: Japan: Families Fear for Graves of Loved Ones

Yet more, related to Japan’s next step: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying

Also related to Japan’s next step: Kishida Follows Anti-Family Federation Minister

Also related to Japan’s next step: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy

Still more, related to Japan’s next step: Malicious One-Sided Government Source Selection

And still more, related to Japan’s next step: Japan Urged to Make U-Turn

And yet more, related to Japan’s next step: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions

Even more, related to Japan’s next step: Japan Following the Way of China

Yet more, related to Japan’s next step: Japanese Communists’ Final War

Still more, related to Japan’s next step: Political and Social Activism behind Oppression

Still more, related to Japan indoctrinating children: Dissolution Case: Rule of Law on Trial 4th March

Categories

Send us a message

Post Form