Sympathy for terrorists created by media’s generous coverage of motive and background of assassins and would-be assassins

Tokyo, 5th September 2024 – Published as the 26th article in a series in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article
Series: Freedom of Religion Under Threat – Part 4: Media Crossing the Line
Classic impression manipulation without remorse
by the Religious Freedom Investigative Team of the editorial department of Sekai Nippo
See part 1: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article
See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article
See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article
See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article
See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article
See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 40th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article
See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48th article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article, 55th article
See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article
On 15th April 2023, an explosive device was thrown near Prime Minister Fumio Kishida as he was giving a campaign speech for a House of Representatives by-election. This led to an unexpected debate regarding reporting about terrorism.
As previously reported, international political scientist Yuichi Hosoya (細谷雄一) pointed out on Twitter (now X) that the “general understanding in terrorism research” is that “the very attitude of trying to understand the background of terrorist crimes aids and abets terrorists in achieving their goals.” However, this understanding is not common in Japan.

After the incident, Goshi Hosono (細野豪志), a member of the House of Representatives from the Liberal Democratic Party, stated,
“Once someone commits terrorism, I don’t give any consideration to their claims or background. From such things we can deduce no general way to deal with terror.”
As the content of the perpetrator’s tweets and other details began to be reported, Hosono argued,
“The media has begun a race to report on the man who attacked Prime Minister Kishida and his motives for the terror. I see no value in this reporting other than that they ‘sell’.”

Similar opinions also spread online. In response, the Tokyo Shimbun‘s special report section published an article titled “What’s the Logic Behind ‘Don’t Report the Perpetrator’s Motive’?” (posted online on 22nd April), where journalist Satoru Aoki (青木理) countered, saying,
“When politicians, regardless of party affiliation, start telling the media ‘not to report on this’, the very foundation of democracy collapses.”
Asahi Shimbun Digital also addressed the issue in an article titled “The Debate on Restricting Reporting in Terror Incidents and the ‘View of the Ignorant Public’” (published on 16th May), where former Hosei University professor Gen Inuzuka (犬塚元) argued, “Such discussions are based on a ‘view of the ignorant public’ and could lead to the collapse of liberal democracy.” Many other rebuttals were posted online.
Of course, in reporting on terrorist crimes, the motives and background are key themes. However, if this reporting is not handled with the utmost care, it could end up aiding the perpetrator’s objectives. What is being called into question is how the media handled reporting on the bomb terrorist attack targeting a sitting prime minister, which could lead to the serious situation of inspiring copycat crimes. It is the media’s responsibility to verify the reporting related to the assassin of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (安倍晋三).


On 18th July 2022, during the broadcast of Yomiuri TV’s program “Information Live Miyane-ya”, they not only displayed the full text of a letter sent by suspect Tetsuya Yamagami (山上徹也) – now a defendant – to journalist Kazuhiro Yonemoto (米本和弘) just before the crime, but also had a female announcer read it aloud without omitting a single word.
The letter contained self-defense statements such as,
“Since my mother joined [the Unification Church], my teenage years passed amid the waste of more than a billion yen, the collapse of my family, and bankruptcy. These experiences have distorted my entire life […]”
It also included clear expressions of his grudge against the family of the founder of the Unification Church and Yamagami’s clear intention to commit murder.
Seiji Miyane (宮根誠司), the host of the show, followed up on this letter, saying, “Of course, there are believers who suffer, but there are also many second-generation believers who endure great pain.” The discussion progressed on the assumption that many followers of the religious organization and second-generation believers suffer, and that this leads to the breakdown of their families.

In the process, three times Miyane showed excerpts from postings believed to be Yamagami’s on Yonemoto’s blog (from December 2020), and also four times excerpts from Yamagami’s tweets and other postings (from May 2021, October 2019, August 2020, and June 2022), Each time the text was projected on the screen and read out by a female announcer.
This is a classic method of manipulation that simultaneously stimulates both the visual and the auditory senses. Reporting the perpetrator’s claims so thoroughly on public airwaves just ten days after former Prime Minister Abe was shot and killed, cannot be considered proper journalism. The motives and background behind Yamagami’s act of terror were reported over and over again. This is reminiscent of some forms of indoctrination.
Despite this, to date there has been no proper investigation, reflection, or disciplinary action related to the coverage.
See part 1: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article
See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article
See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article
See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article
See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article
See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 40th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article
See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48th article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article, 55th article
See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article
Featured image above: Reporting of sensational news. Illustration: Microsoft Designer Image Creator, 6th September 2024.
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Media Helping Terrorist Reach His Goal
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Kishida Administration Giving in to Terrorism
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Kishida Has Opened Can of Worms
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Bizarre Atlantic Report Condoning Terror
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Japan Times: Warning of Terror
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Did constant hate-mongering cause terror?
Related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming
More, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights
And more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”
Still more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations
Even more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Japan Following the Way of China
And still more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan
And even more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Conference on Religious Freedom Violations
Still more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Japan: Threat to Religious Freedom
Even more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Call to End Witch Hunt
More, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out
More, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Japan: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions
And more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Illegalities of Activist Lawyers Exposed
Yet more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying
Still more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Biased Information from Leftwing Lawyers
Even more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions
Even more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Kyodo News: 100s of Rights Violations Claimed
Even more, related to generating sympathy for terrorists: Fabricated Torts Part of Wily Strategy in Japan







