Mistrust of Religion: State Persecuting Minority

Wako Higashi describes mistrust of religion

Buddhist chief priest points to the Japanese government’s handling of religious minority as evidence of current authorities’ general mistrust of religion

Sekai Nippo on LDP pressuring council
Logo of the Sekai Nippo

Tokyo, 26th November 2024 – Published as the 40th article in a series in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article

Series: Freedom of Religion Under Threat – Part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders

Chief Priest of Chogyoan (聴行庵) Buddhist Temple, Wako Higashi (東和空)

Freedom of religion tying together state and individual

by the editorial department of Sekai Nippo

See part 1: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article

See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article

See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article

See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article 

See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article

See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article

See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48 article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article, 55th article

See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article

Wako Higashi
Chief Priest Wako Higashi. Photo: Sekai Nippo

First, as a Buddhist, I have been mindful not to irresponsibly voice opinions on matters without fully understanding the facts. In a sense, I have questioned the veracity of reporting that, in its approach, seems to belittle the personal faith of individuals and opportunistically broadens issues related to certain organizations without due consideration.

See also Buddhist Priest Warns Japan ‘Cult’ Ban Risks All

Against this backdrop, I cannot help but feel a tinge of unease at the prospect that this series of government procedures may reveal political motives targeting religious corporations. It raises a concern that this might well run counter to the lofty divine or spiritual intention behind the concept of “freedom”, which is a profound blessing bestowed upon human society.

For example, I sensed political motives behind the timing of the government’s request [Editor’s note: request for a court order to dissolve the Family Federation], which coincided with an upcoming extraordinary Diet session and by-elections for the House of Representatives [Editor’s note: Lower house in the national parliament] and the House of Councillors (upper house), as well as in their apparent intent to show a firm stance toward the religious organization in question.

Additionally, one approach to determining whether to issue a dissolution order considered the existence of criminal cases as a criterion. But it seems there now also exists a theoretical framework to justify the request for a dissolution order by directly applying civil law in order to highlight unlawful actions by the organization.

Religious Corporations Council
The Council of Religious Corporations discussing the use of the questioning rights by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) against the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (previously known as the Unification Church) – 14th December 2022, Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo. Photo: Sekai Nippo

Furthermore, it was decided not to open the Religious Corporation Council [Editor’s note: The Religious Corporations Council in Japan is an advisory body to the Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). It plays a role in overseeing and advising on matters related to religious corporations. The council is composed of experts, academics, and representatives from diverse fields, including legal scholars, sociologists, and individuals familiar with religious practices. Its members are appointed by the Minister of MEXT. The Council is meant to ensure that any government intervention respects the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom while maintaining public welfare.] to the public and not to disclose the minutes of the meetings.

This could be seen as a political disregard for religion. Therefore, it is essential to clarify the process and reasoning for calling into question – based on an arguably naive assumption of innate goodwill – the suitability of a religious corporation. Unless this is clarified to the roughly 650,000 religious instructors in Japan, the impression of mistrust of religion will be difficult to erase in the future.

For this reason, I sincerely hope that this series of deliberations and the public’s interest in them will adhere to the fundamental principle of “freedom of religion” and be conducted with full democratic control and transparency.

Buddhist praying
Japanese Buddhist praying. Illustration: Microsoft Designer Image Creator, 27th Nov. 2024

In Buddhist teachings, ‘freedom’ means relying on oneself. It refers to a way of living that maintains relationships with the external social environment without being swayed by it – a state in which one’s personal convictions are firmly established. While we are inherently free, we become trapped, biased, and fixated on ourselves, others, and our surroundings, which causes suffering.

In this context, the government’s recent handling of religion in contemporary society has left a significant message about our freedom to pursue happiness. As we reflect on whether religion, which has historically served as a bridge between the nation and the individual, has upheld the spiritual freedom of human beings, we must also ask whether the state has truly respected freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. Additionally, has the press refrained from overreaching into matters of free expression and academic freedom?

Understanding that human ideals and happiness rely on the ability of free individuals to maximize their potential within society, I, as a Buddhist monk, feel deeply the need to reconcile the enormous gap between these ideals and the current reality. This disparity significantly reduces the level of happiness of the Japanese people.

If this sense of stagnation or unease could be alleviated through the influence of religion, it would involve enhancing happiness through means beyond income or material wealth. Factors such as societal freedom, tolerance, and the absence of corruption play significant roles in this endeavor. Observing the ongoing individualization of society and the evolving personal nature of religious practice, it becomes clear that a warm-hearted freedom is increasingly intertwined with personal happiness.

When considering individual freedom, we must ask whether it is a freedom recognized by others, a freedom that does not harm either party, or a freedom that contributes to national interests. At the same time, it is crucial for society and organizations to recognize that the freedom of individual consciousness is inherently linked to the broader social freedom in parallel worlds [Editor’s note: In Buddhism, “parallel worlds” can be understood as multiple coexisting realms of existence, infinite world-systems in the cosmos, or subjective realities created by karma and perception], and to be aware of the interdependent nature (interconnectedness) of all living beings.

To comprehend the true freedom and order that the divine and Buddha espouse amidst the chaos (entropy) of conflicting interests and impermanent activities, we pray not only to win by majority rule. Instead, we should aim for gradual reconciliation, where both sides stand on equal footing, respecting essential order and national interest with dignity. May this process lead to a harmonious resolution.

Sincerely, with hands joined in prayer,

Wako Higashi (東和空), Chief Priest of Chogyoan (聴行庵) Temple.

See also Buddhist Priest Warns Japan ‘Cult’ Ban Risks All

Featured image above: Wako Higashi in January 2024. Photo: Sekai Nippo

See part 1: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article

See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article

See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article

See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article 

See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article

See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article

See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48 article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article, 55th article

See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article

Related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Japan: Exhibition Exposes Horrors of Persecution

More, related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Japan Copying Faith-Breaking Concepts of China

Related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Courts Using Debunked Concepts Against Minority

Also related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Dissolution Case: Wild Claims, Illegal Actions

Also related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Terms from Consumer Law Used to Rob Faith

Also related to mistrust of religion in Japan: 2nd-Generation Members Protesting Persecution

Also related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And also related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Bias: No Right to Respond for Religious Minority

More, related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to mistrust of religion in Japan: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Two European Scholars Warning Japan

And yet more related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Japan Censured at Religious Freedom Event

And still more related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Lawyer Exposes Dirty Leftwing Plot

And even more related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And still more related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Malicious One-Sided Government Source Selection

More related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out

More related to mistrust of religion in Japan: Kishida Has Opened Can of Worms

Categories

Send us a message

Post Form