Family Federation denounces provisional seizure of land as unfair as Tokyo District Court approves request from hostile lawyers’ network

Tokyo, 31st July 2025 – Published as an article in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article.
Spokesperson of Religious Organization: “The Petition (Filing) Is Dishonest”
Provisional Seizure of Headquarters Land of Former Unification Church
by the editorial department of Sekai Nippo
See also “Liquidation Is Like Being Robbed of Our Assets”
See also “No Freedom of Assembly If State Seizes Church”
See also Japan Copying China: State Seizure of Churches
See also Church Assets: Lawyers Move to “Seize Them All”

Based on a request from former followers, the Tokyo District Court has issued a decision approving a provisional seizure (temporary court freeze) of the land in Shibuya Ward, Tokyo, where the headquarters of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church) is located.
In response, the religious organization’s Public Relations and External Affairs Office commented on the official X account (formerly Twitter) on 30th July, stating:
“An entirely unnecessary and wasteful procedure has been carried out. There are absolutely no plans to dispose of the land in question.”

The National Network of Lawyers Against Spiritual Sales announced on 30th July that ten former followers currently undergoing civil mediation with the religious organization filed the request in June of this year. On 18th July, the Tokyo District Court approved the provisional seizure of the Family Federation headquarters’ land.
This marks the first application of a special law enacted in December 2023 [See editor’s note 1 below]. While the religious organization can continue operating from its headquarters as before, in principle, it will no longer be able to sell or transfer the land.
The official X account also posted:
“This one-sided (unilateral) [See editor’s note 2 below] provisional seizure is contrary to good faith, dishonest, and deeply regrettable.”
See also “Liquidation Is Like Being Robbed of Our Assets”
See also “No Freedom of Assembly If State Seizes Church”
See also Japan Copying China: State Seizure of Churches
See also Church Assets: Lawyers Move to “Seize Them All”
Featured image above: Tokyo headquarters of the Family Federation of Japan. Photo: Asanagi / Wikimedia Commons. Public domain image. Cropped
[Editor’s note 1: The “special law enacted in December 2023” refers to a legal change that significantly increased government oversight of religious organizations like the former Unification Church (now the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification). Key features include:
- Religious organizations are required to report their assets – including real estate holdings – to the government at least once every three months.
- The religious organizations must notify the government in advance before selling or transferring real estate.
- The law provides assistance to former members seeking compensation for “damages” caused by donation practices.
- Authorities can order a religious organization to halt certain activities; failure to comply may result in fines (up to ¥1 million) or imprisonment (up to 1 year).

The Tokyo District Court’s decision on 18th July 2025 to approve a provisional seizure of the Family Federation’s Tokyo headquarters land was the first time this law was applied in practice. While the religious organization can continue to operate from the site, the law effectively prevents any sale or transfer of the land, since that would trigger the legal requirements or violate the new restrictions.
This law is often referred to in reports as the special or “asset-tracking” law and was enacted on 13th December 2023. Its application in July 2025 sets a legal precedent by allowing the court to temporarily freeze the Family Federation’s property under these provisions.]
[Editor’s note 2: “One-sided” here means the Family Federation sees the court’s decision as favoring the plaintiffs and ignoring the religious organization’s side of the story. The statement that the provisional seizure is “one-sided” means that the Family Federation believes the seizure was done without fair consultation, without their agreement or input, and solely at the request of the opposing party, the former followers. In other words, the religious organization feels the process was unfair or lacked due consideration of their position. They were not properly heard or involved before the court made the decision. The court granted the seizure based only on the claims of the former members.
In legal terms, a provisional seizure (仮差し押さえ) is often granted by a court before a full trial, usually based on a request from one party. It temporarily freezes property (like land or assets) to prevent it from being sold or transferred while a legal dispute is ongoing.
Even though the Family Federation denounces the court’s decision as biased or unjust, in practice, and as spelt out in the law of December 2023 [See above editor’s note 1], Japanese courts can grant provisional seizures without prior notice to the opposing party, precisely to prevent asset transfers.]
Related to provisional seizure of land: Lawfare: State Uses Legal System in War on Faith
Also related to provisional seizure of land: “Lawyers Lying and Shaming Japan” for 50 Years
And also related to provisional seizure of land: “Liquidation Is Like Being Robbed of Our Assets”
More, related to provisional seizure of land: “No Freedom of Assembly If State Seizes Church”
Even more, related to provisional seizure of land: Japan Copying China: State Seizure of Churches
Also related to provisional seizure of land: Church Assets: Lawyers Move to “Seize Them All”
And also related to provisional seizure of land: Japan Following the Way of China
Yet more, related to provisional seizure of land: Japan’s Dissolution Case Echoes China’s Playbook
More, related to provisional seizure of land: Media/Legal Expert: Communism Behind Persecution
And more, related to provisional seizure of land: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy
More, related to provisional seizure of land: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights
And more, related to provisional seizure of land: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”
And still more, related to provisional seizure of land: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan
More, related to provisional seizure of land: Japan: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions
Yet more, related to provisional seizure of land: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying
Also related to provisional seizure of land: Kishida Follows Anti-Family Federation Minister
Also related to provisional seizure of land: Militant Lawyers Dictate Government Policy
Still more, related to provisional seizure of land: Malicious One-Sided Government Source Selection
Yet more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Kishida’s Self-Defeating Populist Decisions
And still more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Japan Urged to Make U-Turn
And yet more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions
Still more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations
Even more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Japan Following the Way of China
Yet more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Japanese Communists’ Final War
Still more, related to temporary court freeze on land: Political and Social Activism behind Oppression







