Report to UN: Japan Violates Rights Standards

International human rights expert exposes in report to UN how Japan violates rights of 600,000 members of religious minority Family Federation

Tokyo, 23rd December 2024 – Published as the 55th article in a series in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article

Series: Freedom of Religion Under Threat – Part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context

Dissolution Proceedings Violate International Standards

French Human Rights Lawyer Reports to the UN

by the Religious Freedom Investigative Team of the editorial department of Sekai Nippo

See part 1 of the series: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article

See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article

See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article

See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article 

See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article

See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 40th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article

See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48th article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article

See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article

Patricia Duval, a French international lawyer specializing in human rights issues, submitted a report to the United Nations in September, calling for reforms. She stated that the Japanese government’s request for a dissolution order against the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (FFWPU, formerly the Unification Church) “violates international human rights law in many respects and infringes upon treaties Japan has ratified to guarantee fundamental rights and freedoms.”

At a presentation in Geneva, Switzerland, Duval highlighted that civil lawsuits demanding the return of donations from the Family Federation stem from former members who left the church after experiencing “abduction and forcible faith-breaking (deprogramming)”. She emphasized that these lawsuits are being used by the Japanese government as grounds to initiate currently pending dissolution proceedings against the church.

The Human Rights Committee, which oversees the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), has called on the Japanese government to make amends, claiming that it has “unlawfully restricted the right to freedom of religion or belief on the basis of the ‘public welfare’.” In its recommendations, the committee expressed concern that the “concept of ‘public welfare’ is vague and open-ended” and that it “may allow for restrictions that go beyond what is permissible.”

However, according to Duval, the Japanese government has ignored these recommendations. She pointed out that Japan’s Religious Corporations Act, which justifies dissolution orders based on “violations of public welfare”, must be repealed to align with international human rights standards.

Furthermore, following the assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (安倍晋三), Patricia Duval pointed out that “a media onslaught against the former Unification Church, led by the National Network of Lawyers Against Spiritual Sales (Zenkoku-benren), began.” This led to many cases of believers being discriminated against, subjected to domestic violence, and divorced have occurred.

The National Network used “spiritual sales” as a pretext to criticize the Family Federation, a narrative amplified by the media to sway public opinion. This media frenzy, in turn, pressured the Japanese government to sever all ties with the church, culminating in the initiation of dissolution proceedings. Duval described how this cycle extended to the judiciary, which, under pressure from the media and public opinion, has repeatedly handed down rulings unfavorable to the church.

Concerning the 32 lawsuits cited as grounds for the dissolution request, Duval noted two major issues:

1. Courts relied on the discredited theory of “mental manipulation” (mind control).
2. The “social acceptability” standard used to determine the legality of donation solicitation was deemed “arbitrary and vague”.

These ambiguous and discriminatory concepts, Duval argued, have been exploited to restrict the former Unification Church‘s right to proselytize. Furthermore, judges displayed a “presumption of guilt” against believers, often ignoring their claims.

On the other hand, regarding the Japanese government’s justification for restricting “freedom to manifest religion or belief”, it was pointed out that International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) does not include “public welfare” or “social acceptability” as valid grounds. The Japanese government was accused of “continuing to violate the UN covenants it has signed and ratified.”

The report also criticized “anti-cult” counseling in schools, describing it as a new form of “state-led deprogramming” that doesn’t involve physical abduction but still violates the rights of religious “second-generation” individuals. Such measures were condemned for infringing on parents’ rights to educate their children based on their faith, as guaranteed under human rights covenants.

Considering the series of actions taken by the government, one cannot shake the impression that this is a state-led project aimed at eradicating a specific religious organization. Some media outlets have reported on the closed-door hearings at the Tokyo District Court regarding the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology’s (MEXT) request for a dissolution order against the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification. During witness examinations involving former and current believers, current members reportedly argued that “the claims made by former members contain falsehoods.”

Could MEXT be leveraging former members to support its arbitrary assertions? Continuing to violate UN covenants risks Japan being perceived by the international community as a nation that suppresses religious freedom.

Featured image above: Patricia Duval presenting her report in Geneva, Switzerland 25th September 2024. Photo: FOREF

End of part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context

See part 1 of the series: The Kishida Administration’s Reckless Actions: 1st article, 2nd article, 3rd article, 4th article, 5th article, 6th article

See part 2: Ripples to Local Assemblies: 7th article, 8th article, 9th article, 10th article, 11th article, 12th article, 13th article, 14th article, 15th article

See part 3: Believers Suffering Discrimination and Human Rights Violations: 16th article, 17th article, 18th article, 19th article, 20th article, 21st article, 22nd article

See part 4: Media Crossing the Line: 23rd article, 24th article, 25th article, 26th article, 27th article, 28th article 

See part 5: The Distorted Image of the “Second-Generation”: 29th article, 30th article, 31st article, 32nd article, 33rd article, 34th article, 35th article, 36th article, 37th article, 38th article

See part 6: Voices of Religious Leaders: 39th article, 40th article, 41st article, 42nd article, 43rd article, 44th article, 45th article, 46th article

See part 7: Religion in Japan in a Global Context: 47th article, 48th article, 49th article, 50th article, 51st article, 52nd article, 53rd article, 54th article

See Epilogue: 56th article, 57th article, 58th article

Related to Japan violates rights: Japan: Exhibition Exposes Horrors of Persecution

More, related to Japan violates rights: Japan Copying Faith-Breaking Concepts of China

Related to Japan violates rights: Courts Using Debunked Concepts Against Minority

Also related to Japan violates rights: Dissolution Case: Wild Claims, Illegal Actions

Also related to Japan violates rights: Terms from Consumer Law Used to Rob Faith

Also related to Japan violates rights: 2nd-Generation Members Protesting Persecution

Also related to Japan violates rights: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And also related to Japan violates rights: Bias: No Right to Respond for Religious Minority

More, related to Japan violates rights: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to Japan violates rights: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to Japan violates rights: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more related to Japan violates rights: Two European Scholars Warning Japan

And yet more related to Japan violates rights: Japan Censured at Religious Freedom Event

And still more related to Japan violates rights: Lawyer Exposes Dirty Leftwing Plot

And even more related to Japan violates rights: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And still more related to Japan violates rights: Malicious One-Sided Government Source Selection

More related to Japan violates rights: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out

More related to Japan violates rights: Kishida Has Opened Can of Worms