Victim of Inhuman Detention Won Defamation Case

Activist journalist sentenced for condescending, defamatory remarks against victim of more than 12 years of inhuman confinement in defamation case

Tokyo, 1st February 2025 – Published as an article in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article. 

Eito Suzuki’s Remarks Deemed Defamatory – Called Confined Follower a “Hikikomori” on Nippon TV’s Miyaneya

Tokyo District Court

by the editorial department of Sekai Nippo

See also Disappointing Overturned Defamation Decision

On 31^st January, the Tokyo District Court ruled in a lawsuit in which Toru Goto (後藤徹), the representative of the National Association of Victims of Abduction, Confinement, and Forced Deconversion, sought ¥11 million in damages for defamation over statements by journalist Eito Suzuki (鈴木エイト) referring to Goto as a “hikikomori” (social recluse – see editor’s note below). Presiding Judge Yasuhiro Ichiba (一場康宏) ruled that some of Suzuki’s statements constituted defamation and ordered him to pay ¥110,000 [$ 711].

Goto, a follower of the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church), was confined in a Tokyo apartment for 12 years and 5 months (September 1995 – February 2008) by relatives seeking to force him to renounce his faith.

He had previously filed a civil lawsuit against the involved relatives, anti-cult activists, and a Christian pastor. In September 2015, Japan’s Supreme Court upheld his victory, dismissing an appeal from the pastor and others.

According to the ruling on 31^st January, two out of five statements made by Suzuki were deemed defamatory. Specifically:

1. An October 2015 article in the online media outlet Yaya Nikkan Cult Shimbun, where Suzuki described Goto’s experience as a “12-year-long hikikomori lifestyle”.
2. An 12^th August 2022, appearance on Nippon TV’s Miyaneya, where Suzuki stated that Goto was in an “almost hikikomori state.”

The court determined these statements lowered Goto’s social reputation and emphasized that since Suzuki made these remarks after the 2015 Supreme Court ruling, he had no reasonable grounds to believe Goto was merely a social recluse.

However, the court dismissed three other defamation claims, including an August 2023 post by Suzuki on X (formerly Twitter) that said, “It doesn’t matter if antisocial groups play the victim.”

Following the ruling, Shinichi Tokunaga (徳永信一), Goto’s attorney, noted that three of Suzuki’s five statements were not recognized as defamatory. Tokunaga argued,

“If we take a strict stance on human rights violations, the court should not have allowed these statements. Journalists and the judiciary must approach such issues with greater responsibility.”

Goto highlighted the widespread issue of forcible faith-breaking through abduction and confinement, stating,

“Thousands of people have suffered, yet Japan has not fully recognized this issue. Through this ruling, I hope to raise awareness and prevent such incidents from happening again.”

Both Goto and Suzuki have expressed their intention to appeal the ruling.

See also Disappointing Overturned Defamation Decision

[Editor’s note: The Japanese term “hikikomori” (引きこもり) refers to people who completely withdraw from social life, often isolating themselves at home for extended periods – sometimes years. It describes both the phenomenon and the individuals affected by it.

Hikikomori typically avoid school, work, and social interactions, often due to anxiety, social pressure, or mental health struggles such as depression. The term is sometimes used in a derogatory way but is also recognized as a serious social issue in Japan and other countries.]

Featured image above: From a press conference 31^st January 2025, Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo, held after the verdict in the defamation case. From the right: Attorney Shinichi Tokunaga (徳永信一), Toru Goto (後藤徹), representative of the National Association of Victims of Abduction, Confinement, and Forced Religious Conversion, and Attorney Tatsuki Nakayama (中山達樹). Photo: Takahide Ishii (石井孝秀)

Related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Japan: Exhibition Exposes Horrors of Persecution

More, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Japan Copying Faith-Breaking Concepts of China

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Criticism Grows: Japan’s Alarming Judicial Trends

And also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Civil Case Ruling Shows Partiality of Judiciary

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Exhibition Exposes Dehumanization of Believers

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Huge Bias: Judges Clearly Swayed by Media

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Appeal Rejected: “Abdication of Judiciary’s Role”

More, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Japanese Government Rejects UN Investigation

More, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: 2024: Why Doesn’t Japan Accept UN Visit?

Related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Courts Using Debunked Concepts Against Minority

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Dissolution Case: Wild Claims, Illegal Actions

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Terms from Consumer Law Used to Rob Faith

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: 2nd-Generation Members Protesting Persecution

Also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

And also related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Bias: No Right to Respond for Religious Minority

More, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Two European Scholars Warning Japan

And yet more, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Japan Censured at Religious Freedom Event

And still more, related to rare defamation case victory in Japan: Lawyer Exposes Dirty Leftwing Plot