Yamagami Trial: Peril of Romanticizing Terror

Scene of assassination of Shinzo Abe

Editorial as Yamagami’s trial opens: A fair trial must reveal the full truth without allowing misplaced sympathy for assassin’s heinous act of terror.

Sekai Nippo on LDP pressuring council
Logo of the Sekai Nippo

Tokyo, 28th October 2025 – Published as an article in the Japanese newspaper Sekai Nippo. Republished with permission. Translated from Japanese. Original article.

Editorial

Face the Reality of a Heinous Act of Terror

First Hearing in Abe Assassination Trial

by the editorial board of Sekai Nippo

See also Social Media, Reporting Cited as Fueling Terror

See also Murder of Abe Was Terrorism ‒ Trial Must Say So

See also Politics Fueled Japan’s Attack on Federation

See also Justice Rendered, Questions Remain in Abe Murder

See also Dissolution, System of Faith-Breaking, Lawsuits

Tetsuya Yamagami
Tetsuya Yamagami, indicted for the assassination of Shinzo Abe, the former prime minister of Japan. Photo: Andrew2592009 / Wikimedia Commons. License: CC ASA 4.0 Int. Cropped

Today [28th October] marks the opening of the first session in the lay judge trial of Tetsuya Yamagami (山上徹也), who has been indicted for murder and other charges in the July 2022 assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (安倍晋三).

A fair trial is essential – one that uncovers the truth while never losing sight of the fact that this was an act of terrorism.

The Sentence Will Be the Main Point of Contention

The defendant attacked Abe during a campaign speech for the House of Councillors election, using a homemade gun. This was an extremely grave act of terrorism that shook the very foundations of democracy.

However, after the Nara Prefectural Police leaked that Yamagami’s motive stemmed from resentment toward the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification (formerly the Unification Church), to which his mother was a member, a wave of sympathy for the defendant began to spread.

According to reports, Yamagami intends to admit to the murder charge, with the trial focusing on his sentencing. His defense team is expected to argue for leniency, claiming that his mother’s large donations to the former Unification Church constituted “religious abuse” of her child. Yet invoking such a notion – far removed from international norms – risks clouding the lay judges’ judgment.

On the other hand, prosecutors are expected to emphasize the malice and premeditation of the crime. The evidence is clear: Yamagami built the homemade firearm himself and researched Abe’s schedule in advance.

Flower offering for Shinzo Abe
A floral tribute stand set up at Osaka Gokoku Shrine on 6th July 2024, on the occasion of the second anniversary of the death of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Organized by the Itagaki Taisuke Memorial Association. Photo: Photo memories 1868 / Wikimedia Commons. License: CC Attr 4.0 Int

Still, the essence of the case lies not only in these details but in the fact that it was a terrorist attack carried out during an election speech, striking at the heart of democracy. Moreover, Yamagami attacked and killed Abe – who was not even his direct target of resentment – in order to stir public criticism of the former Unification Church and to avenge his grudge against the religious organization.

Yamagami has reportedly said that Abe “was not his true enemy.” Yet he allegedly calculated that if he killed the former prime minister – Japan’s longest-serving leader – based on the vague perception that Abe was “close to” the former Unification Church, the media would turn on the religious organization.

Tsuyoshi Inukai
Prime Minister Tsuyoshi Inukai (犬養毅 – 1855 – 1932). Photo: Wikimedia Commons. Public domain image. Cropped

Echoes of the 15th May 1932 Incident

The aftermath of this event recalls the 15th May Incident of 1932, in which Prime Minister Tsuyoshi Inukai (犬養毅) was assassinated. The naval officers responsible received light sentences after public and press sympathy swelled in their favor, fueling an atmosphere that tolerated political violence.

A similar pattern emerged when Mainichi Shimbun faced public backlash for describing an upcoming feature on the Abe assassination as exploring the “social justification of the incident”.

The social consequences have already been severe: in April 2023, a copycat attack occurred, when then-Prime Minister Fumio Kishida (岸田文雄) was targeted with a homemade explosive device.

The trial over Abe’s assassination should focus squarely on the essence of Yamagami’s actions and bring to light the background behind them.

Lingering Doubts About the ‘Lone Wolf’ Theory

Nara Prefectural Police investigated and the prosecution indicted Yamagami as a lone perpetrator. Yet questions remain.

For example, the findings of Dr. Hidetada Fukushima (福島英賢) of Nara Medical University Hospital – who treated Abe – stated that Abe’s heart had suffered major damage, while the police autopsy results reportedly differed sharply. There are also reports that the fatal bullet has not been located.

These are not mere “conspiracy theories”, but reasonable questions that must be addressed. The court is expected to hear testimony from the medical examiners involved, and satisfactory explanations are essential. Only through that process can the full truth of the incident be brought to light.

See also Social Media, Reporting Cited as Fueling Terror

See also Murder of Abe Was Terrorism ‒ Trial Must Say So

See also Justice Rendered, Questions Remain in Abe Murder

See also Dissolution, System of Faith-Breaking, Lawsuits

See also Cancel Culture, Cultural Hegemony, Universities

Featured image above: The scene of the assassination of Shinzo Abe in front of Yamato-Saidaiji Station in Nara City, Japan. Photo: (撮影)一般社団法人板垣退助先生顕彰会  (アップロード)/ Wikimedia Commons. License: CC ASA 4.0 Int. Cropped

Related to Yamagami trial: Abe Murder 3-Year Trial Delay: Calls for Truth

Also related to Yamagami trial: Lone-Wolf Theory Disputed in Abe Assassination

Also related to Yamagami trial: “Organized Terrorism, Not Lone Wolf, Killed Abe”

Also related to Yamagami trial:  Media Helping Terrorist Reach His Goal

Also related to Yamagami trial: Kishida Administration Giving in to Terrorism

And also related to Yamagami trial: Kishida Has Opened Can of Worms

More, related to Yamagami trial: Aiding Terrorist, Media Bashes Minority Religion

And more, related to Yamagami trial: Bizarre Atlantic Report Condoning Terror

Still more, related to Yamagami trial: Japan Times: Warning of Terror

Yet more, related to Yamagami trial: Did constant hate-mongering cause terror?

Even more, related to Yamagami trial: Inhuman Government-Supported Mass Deprogramming

More, related to Yamagami trial: Collusion to Rob Minority of Its Rights

And more, related to Yamagami trial: State and Media Creating “Today’s Non-Citizens”

Still more, related to Yamagami trial: Japan Criticized for Glaring Rights Violations

Even more, related to Yamagami trial: Japan Following the Way of China

And still more, related to Yamagami trial: 12 Religious Freedom NGOs Denouncing Japan

And even more, related to Yamagami trial: Conference on Religious Freedom Violations

Still more, related to Yamagami trial: Japan: Threat to Religious Freedom

Even more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Call to End Witch Hunt

More, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Government’s Foul Play Pointed Out

More, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Japan: 4300 Abductions and Forcible Detentions

And more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Illegalities of Activist Lawyers Exposed

Yet more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Lawyers Manipulating, Coercing, Lying

Still more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Biased Information from Leftwing Lawyers

Even more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Dangerous Precedent to Crush Religions

Even more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Kyodo News: 100s of Rights Violations Claimed

Even more, related to peril of romanticizing terror: Fabricated Torts Part of Wily Strategy in Japan

Categories

Send us a message

Post Form